Grand Challenges in Biomedical Image Analysis

bibkeys: github: https://github.com/comic/grand-challenge.org

We develop and maintain grand-challenge.org, a Django site for hosting challenges in biomedical imaging, annotating data and making deep learning models accessible to clinicians. This text is adapted from our abstract at the Challenges in Machine Learning workshop at NeurIPS 2018.

Introduction

An increasing reliance on imaging for clinical decision making and an ageing population has resulted in an unprecedented demand for trained personnel to interpret medical images. As this demand is unable to be met there is consequently an increased workload for physicians, increasing the likelihood of interpretation errors. Computer-aided detection and diagnosis systems have been developed to assist in reducing this workload and to enable more reliable clinical decisions. Challenges in biomedical image analysis have proven successful in driving innovation in creating algorithms that form components of these systems. However, for the algorithm developer, there exists a validation gap between performing well on the curated challenge data to transitioning to the clinic where imaging devices, scanning protocols, and populations can vary significantly, and integration with heterogeneous clinical systems and clinicians' workflows is non-trivial.

Since 2012, as part of the Consortium for Open Medical Image Computing, we have developed and maintained an open source framework for hosting challenges in biomedical imaging, and support an instance of this at grand-challenge.org. Here, we have hosted successful challenges across various medical domains, such as LUNA16 for lung nodule detection, CAMELYON16/17 in digital pathology and The Medical Imaging Decathlon for 10 segmentation tasks in CT and MRI. The platform is now integral to our groups work, from private challenges used in educational courses to the reproducibility of scientific output and archiving of developed algorithms. The platform has recently been extended to assist the algorithm developer in clinical validation by allowing clinicians to execute algorithms on their own data via a web interface.

The grand-challenge.org project is developed on GitHub and consists of 3 main components:

  • the grand-challenge.org framework, a re-usable platform for hosting challenges.
  • Evalutils, a pip installable python package that assists challenge administrators in creating Docker containers for evaluating submissions from challenge participants and for creating Docker containers for processing algorithm submissions.
  • CIRRUS, a platform for developing medical imaging workstations that integrates with clinicians' workflows.

Whilst grand-challenge and evalutils are open source and licensed under Apache 2.0 and MIT respectively, CIRRUS is currently closed source but alternative viewers that integrate with the grand-challenge API could also be used, such as AMI or Cornerstone.

The Grand-Challenge.org Framework

The platform is a web application that uses Django 2.1, backed by a PostgreSQL database and a Celery task queue with a Redis message broker. The application is distributed as a set of Docker containers, which are automatically published to Docker Hub after all tests have passed in Travis-CI. A Docker Compose file allows site administrators to quickly launch another instance of the framework on their own infrastructure, or for developers to replicate the entire stack on their machine.

We maintain an instance of the framework at grand-challenge.org. Here, anyone can join the site and become a challenge administrator by creating their own challenge. Other users are also able to join the site, sign up as participants in particular challenges and collaborate on solutions as teams. Currently, there are 24,000+ users, participating in 160+ public and private challenges hosted on the site. We also index challenges in medical imaging hosted on other sites, providing a valuable resource to the community in searching for datasets and benchmarks relevant to their tasks.

A challenge in the framework consists of a set of pages that describe the challenge, datasets for training and testing, the ground truth annotations for those datasets, and a method to evaluate submissions. Challenge participants submit their predictions as CSV files or ITK images. Each submission will be evaluated using that challenges evaluation method, which is provided by the challenge administrator as a Docker image. An instance of the evaluation image will be launched with the current submission attached as a Docker volume, and the container must produce a JSON file containing the score for this submission, which is then aggregated in the database. Instances of these images will be scheduled by Celery on an available Docker host, which for security reasons could be inside an isolated virtual machine.

A grand-challenge algorithm consists of code for extracting information from ITK images. The web-interface allows algorithm administrators to upload, test, demonstrate, and share algorithms. Algorithm administrators can upload an algorithm as a Docker image and subsequently run those on various images. After choosing an algorithm and submitting an image, an instance of the algorithm will be launched with the current submitted image attached as a Docker volume. Subsequently, the algorithm must produce a JSON file containing the results of the algorithm and can optionally produce one or more ITK output images. After successful processing, the results can be inspected and downloaded by the algorithm administrator. Additionally, the algorithm administrator can give other users permission to upload their own images and to download and inspect results as well. Similarly to challenge evaluations, instances of the images will be scheduled by Celery on an available Docker host.

Whilst challenge administrators are free to implement the evaluations and algorithms in any language they choose, we have developed Evalutils, a Python 3.6+ package that assists the creation of evaluation and algorithm containers. The package uses CookieCutter to generate project templates for Classification, Segmentation and Detection challenges and algorithms, provides methods to validate submissions and give feedback to the participants, and to score evaluations using a statistics library designed for medical imaging tasks.

Reproducible Science

Researchers are now able to use the framework as a platform for reproducible science and algorithm archival. If the data can be shared publicly they are separately archived to Zenodo where they receive a DOI or distributed via Academic Torrents if the data are large. Those developing algorithms set their problem up as a challenge on grand-challenge.org and are expected to produce three containers:

  • a training container that trains the model and produces all the figures in the paper,
  • an algorithm container that executes the model on new data and produces a prediction,
  • an evaluation container that will score predictions.

Whilst the training container is archived and executed on our HPC systems, researchers are able to upload algorithm containers to Grand Challenge in the same manner as for evaluation containers.

Integration into Annotation Workflows and Clinical Use

For clinical validation, these models need to be executed on diverse data from heterogeneous sources. Authorised algorithm users are now able to upload their own data and generate predictions from any of the archived model containers available to them. Instances of these model containers are scheduled similarly to the evaluation containers, only that the Nvidia Docker runtime is used and a GPU is attached to the container instance if required.

The predictions generated then need to be assessed in an environment the clinician is familiar with. Our group has previously developed CIRRUS for creating workstations, which is built on MeVisLab and has been used as part of commercial CE and FDA certified products for Chest-CT screening. We have now extended the platform to make it accessible via a web browser so that clinicians are able to launch viewer instances wherever they are located, access algorithms and load any image and prediction available to them on Grand Challenge via a REST API. A clinician can then provide feedback on algorithm performance, generating more ground truth data by correcting the predictions, helping the algorithm developer close the validation gap.

Reader studies

Ground-challenge.org also features a reader study section. A reader study enables users to have a set of readers answer a set of questions about a set of cases. Images for each case can be added in .mha, .mhd/.zraw, .tiff, .jpeg and .png format and an expanding number of dicom files is also supported. These images can be presented in multiple viewports in the study. User progress can be tracked by the study's editors and answers can be exported in .csv format.

An added feature to the reader study functionality is the ability to add ground truth via csv. This makes it possible to monitor the perfomance of readers in a separate statistics view, as well as give an indication of the difficulty of each of the questions and each of the cases. With this feature, reader studies can be used as an educational platform as well.

People

James Meakin

James Meakin

Lead Research Software Engineer

DIAG Research Software Engineering

Sjoerd Kerkstra

Sjoerd Kerkstra

Research Software Engineer

DIAG Research Software Engineering

Paul Konstantin Gerke

Paul Konstantin Gerke

Research Software Engineer

DIAG Research Software Engineering

Harm van Zeeland

Harm van Zeeland

Research Software Engineer

Bram van Ginneken

Bram van Ginneken

Professor, Scientific Co-Director

Sil van de Leemput

Sil van de Leemput

Research Scientist RTC Deep Learning

RTC Deep Learning

Mike Overkamp

Mike Overkamp

Research Software Engineer

DIAG Research Software Engineering

Miriam Groeneveld

Miriam Groeneveld

Research Software Engineer

Computational Pathology Group

Anne Mickan

Anne Mickan

Research Software Engineer

DIAG Research Software Engineering

Chris van Run

Chris van Run

Research Software Engineer

DIAG Research Software Engineering

Kiran Vaidhya Venkadesh

Kiran Vaidhya Venkadesh

Postdoctoral Researcher